Yourself?

I think its the school's computer system. The proxy doesn't clear its cache, so I don't see the changes and publish twice.

What I find particularly interesting with Humans is how seperate the rational mind is from the emotional mind, and how much of persuasion relies on the manipulation between the two.

And its particularly interesting to note that rational is the direct opposite of emotional in so many ways. Social cachet(Emotional Value) is economically worthless(Rational Value) in terms of actual dollars and cents. Love(Emotional Value) is a liability, in terms of incurred costs(Rational Value)... I could go on and on.

Death, to the rational mind, is therefore a horrible thing if you haven't experienced your fullest potential, but would be a wonderful thing if you're now only a liability.
Death, to the emotional mind, would be worthless if you didn't agree with the causes they died for, and would be priceless if you agreed with them.

I don't see it as a paradox-sense. Its like a logical conclusion. A God that hungers for power, would love to imprison and enslave others. Enslaving the self(when one has enslaved all other) would be the greatest, most fulfilling thing a hungry God could do. A God that loves to create, so to speak, will keep creating bigger and better things, until he has created himself, or a better than himself. But if he created himself, or created someone better than himself, he would no longer have control over himself, having given control to his creation, thus being entrapped in a world he created. A god that loves to watch his creation, would watch his creation for eternity, because its all perfect, and he cannot make a more perfect one. And watching his creation for eternity would enslave him in his own world, so to speak.

From the three examples above, I postulate that all motives will result in the eventual enslavement of an omnipresent, omnipotent God.

posted by Downhere. @ 10:22 pm